<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 23:3 (2008:09) NASIG Executive Board Minutes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nasignews.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/233-200809-nasig-executive-board-minutes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nasignews.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/233-200809-nasig-executive-board-minutes/</link>
	<description>News for the North American Serials Interest Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: char</title>
		<link>http://nasignews.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/233-200809-nasig-executive-board-minutes/#comment-17716</link>
		<dc:creator>char</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasignews.wordpress.com/?p=447#comment-17716</guid>
		<description>Susan, after the brainstorming session from the 2007 conference, the board wanted to find ways to make the elections process more transparent. We addressed a number of the issues last fall (putting more documentation up on the website), but also wanted N&amp;E to explore if there was any justification to have a primary-type system (i.e., what we&#039;ve referred to as &#039;open election&#039;). N&amp;E submitted their recommendation to the board for its fall meeting, and the board has asked N&amp;E to prepare an article for the December Newsletter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan, after the brainstorming session from the 2007 conference, the board wanted to find ways to make the elections process more transparent. We addressed a number of the issues last fall (putting more documentation up on the website), but also wanted N&amp;E to explore if there was any justification to have a primary-type system (i.e., what we&#8217;ve referred to as &#8216;open election&#8217;). N&amp;E submitted their recommendation to the board for its fall meeting, and the board has asked N&amp;E to prepare an article for the December Newsletter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Davis</title>
		<link>http://nasignews.wordpress.com/2008/08/05/233-200809-nasig-executive-board-minutes/#comment-17715</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nasignews.wordpress.com/?p=447#comment-17715</guid>
		<description>What are the reasons behind looking into open elections?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the reasons behind looking into open elections?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
